Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 05:35 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,137
Default To Mars via asteroid

Hitch hike to Mars inside an asteroid

Quote:
Burrowing inside an asteroid whose orbit carries it past both the Earth and Mars could protect astronauts from radiation on their way to the Red Planet. The idea is being investigated with funding from NASA.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 05:55 PM
ciderman's Avatar
ciderman ciderman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 472
Default

Makes me think of using mass drivers to fine tune the asteroids trajectory.
One problem that occurs to me is it would make it more difficult to spin the craft to provide some 'gravity'.
I'd like to see a NEA rendevous as a next step after a moon presence, which would fit nicely as a precursor to this strategy.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 06:38 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hum,
it would be a bummer if you missed your stop.
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 07:50 PM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,795
Default

How do you get back? Wait for another asteroid??
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 08:04 PM
galacsi galacsi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pontoise
Posts: 799
Default

A little like the Mars cycler of Edwin Aldrin ? So may be we can christian it a Cycloid ?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 08:35 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hum,
they could name it after the greek, hemer - to tame...
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 08:48 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 11,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blob View Post
Hum,
they could name it after the greek, hemer - to tame...

The inner solar system potentially contains thousands of hemeroids
Well, I for one will not still still for that!

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2006, 10:59 PM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek View Post
It's a student project, not a serious study.

The reality is:

You first have to wait for your asteroid - suitable asteroids come by much more rarely than the 26 month Mars window.

Then you have to match orbits with it - which requires much more dV than a even moderate energy Mars transfer orbit.

You then have to rendezvous with Mars - more dV

It would be better to expend all that propellant to make a faster Mars transfer.

BTW You have include a whole lot of machinery to carry out zero gravity excavation - make that a whole new technology.

All this was examined and rejected in the 50's. if you want to go to Mars-go to Mars. You you want to go to an asteroid-go to an asteroid.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24-October-2006, 07:24 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,230
Default

Quote:
All this was examined and rejected in the 50's. if you want to go to Mars-go to Mars. You you want to go to an asteroid-go to an asteroid.
Yes, or just go to Mars and annoy Phobos and Demnos while you're there.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 24-October-2006, 07:59 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,031
Default

I'd be afraid to
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 24-October-2006, 08:28 AM
Nicolas's Avatar
Nicolas Nicolas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 11,185
Default

Quote:
One problem that occurs to me is it would make it more difficult to spin the craft to provide some 'gravity'.
It is quite impossible to spin any object of reasonable dimensions in such a way that the people inside feel a bit of gravity and yet don't become extremely sick. Its quite easy to calculate.
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 24-October-2006, 04:34 PM
ciderman's Avatar
ciderman ciderman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 472
Default

Oh, didn't realise/think about it!
What's the minimum size then? (over 30 foot?).
Of course you could split it & connect the halves with a tether.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2006, 04:31 AM
He'sDeadJim's Avatar
He'sDeadJim He'sDeadJim is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Up the line in Canada eh
Posts: 22
Default

What am I – a doctor or a asteroid shuttle conductor?!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 28-October-2006, 03:29 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 6,634
Default

Actually, if you're really as your avatar depicts, He'sDeadJim, you're a corpse.

Why not create a strong magnetic field to protect the astronauts? Is it because the size of the field wouldn't be large enough to deflect the radiation?
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 30-October-2006, 09:38 PM
SirThoreth's Avatar
SirThoreth SirThoreth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 349
Send a message via AIM to SirThoreth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ciderman View Post
Oh, didn't realise/think about it!
What's the minimum size then? (over 30 foot?).
Of course you could split it & connect the halves with a tether.
Way over 30 feet: at a 65 meter diameter, you're not going to manage more than fractional G without making everyone ill, due to Coriolis forces.

From what I recall, most people can adapt to around 1 RPM of rotation, while some can adapt to as high as 3 RPMs. Wikipedia has a pretty good article discussing artificial gravity, especially "spin gravity" like we're talking about. They cite a radius of 224 meters at 2 RPMs to produce a full 1G of artificial gravity.

Ah, there it is: there's an online "SpinCalc" I saw on the Battletech forums (spacecraft in that scifi series/game use acceleration or spinning grav decks to produce artificial gravity) way back when. Using that, at 1 RPM, you need a 894 meter radius to produce 1 G of centripetal acceleration.

So, yeah, unless you've got those relly rare individuals who can handle very high numbers of RPMs, you need to get big, which means moving a lot of mass.
__________________
Sleep? Isn't that that totally inadaquate substitute for caffeine I've heard so much about?

Quantumfoamy.com, my astronomy/astrophotography blog.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 31-October-2006, 08:32 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,031
Default

These limitations do not seem to apply to using short arm centrifuges for relative short period exercise purposes. Short arm centrifuges with radii as small as 2 m and accelerations as high as 2G appear to be useful and tolerable.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 31-December-2007, 10:21 PM
spaceboy0 spaceboy0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 169
Default

why would rotation necessarily make you feel sick if it's producing gravity?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 31-December-2007, 11:53 PM
gaetanomarano's Avatar
gaetanomarano gaetanomarano is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,596
Default

link
__________________
gaetanomarano.it
ghostNASA.com
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-January-2008, 12:31 AM
Mike_c130 Mike_c130 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceboy0 View Post
why would rotation necessarily make you feel sick if it's producing gravity?
Having spent time in a Barany chair http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A1r%C3%A1ny_chair, as well as turning aircraft, I can tell you that one thing you don't want to do is spend a lot of time moving your head around in a quickly rotating environment. In a continuously rotating environment, your inner ear will eventually reach an equilibrium where none of its fluid is rotating relative to your head and you feel like you are motionless. But if you turn your head out of the axis of rotation, then the fluid in your ears will begin rotating and you'll feel like you are doing things that aren't physically possible.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-January-2008, 03:44 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_c130 View Post
Having spent time in a Barany chair http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A1r%C3%A1ny_chair, as well as turning aircraft, I can tell you that one thing you don't want to do is spend a lot of time moving your head around in a quickly rotating environment. In a continuously rotating environment, your inner ear will eventually reach an equilibrium where none of its fluid is rotating relative to your head and you feel like you are motionless. But if you turn your head out of the axis of rotation, then the fluid in your ears will begin rotating and you'll feel like you are doing things that aren't physically possible.

Mike
Does this also explain Tequila?
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-January-2008, 09:06 PM
ryanmercer's Avatar
ryanmercer ryanmercer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Greater Helium, Barsoom (Speedway, IN)
Posts: 491
Send a message via AIM to ryanmercer Send a message via Yahoo to ryanmercer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicolas View Post
It is quite impossible to spin any object of reasonable dimensions in such a way that the people inside feel a bit of gravity and yet don't become extremely sick. Its quite easy to calculate.
Ah... so then how do you explain this http://www.nsbri.org/NewsPublicOut/Release.epl?r=86

or the Gravitron ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitron ) amusement park ride (which I've spent a good half hour in without it stopping [friend worked the Gravitron at a 4h fair one year and while it was fairly dead let us stay on it until others wanted to ride] and didn't get ill... sure I walked funny for 10 minutes after getting off though).
__________________
-The Wolf
http://www.ryanmercer.com

Sponsor My Education
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-January-2008, 05:32 AM