Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2007, 05:27 AM
Reverend J Reverend J is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 45
Default New high velocity photonic thruster.

Hi all,
Just got this link from a friend about a new photonic laser thruster (PLT), which in scale up may be able to reach speeds greater than 100 km/s! (>360,000 kph!) and it seems to be the real deal. Anyone know more about this technology and how exactly it works?

Read it here: http://www.photonics.com/content/new...r/7/88894.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2007, 06:05 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend J View Post
Hi all,
Just got this link from a friend about a new photonic laser thruster (PLT), which in scale up may be able to reach speeds greater than 100 km/s! (>360,000 kph!) and it seems to be the real deal. Anyone know more about this technology and how exactly it works?

Read it here: http://www.photonics.com/content/new...r/7/88894.aspx
It looks like it's just a high output light source. Photon rockets are a pretty old idea, but the issue is: Where does the power come from? For any significant thrust, there needs to be a lot of power. I don't see any mention of that here. Also, photon rockets (aside from light sails using an external energy source) don't make a lot of sense for interplanetary flight.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2007, 12:30 PM
galacsi galacsi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW of Paris
Posts: 1,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
It looks like it's just a high output light source. Photon rockets are a pretty old idea, but the issue is: Where does the power come from? For any significant thrust, there needs to be a lot of power. I don't see any mention of that here. Also, photon rockets (aside from light sails using an external energy source) don't make a lot of sense for interplanetary flight.
The trick is to use several times the same photon , each time it strike the resonant cavity in the right direction , it give a little impulsion to the rocket.

In a conventional photonic rocket photons are used only once and dumped outside. So there is a huge wasting of energy and it why photonic propulsion is so inefficient.
That also why they speak of amplification.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2007, 03:17 PM
Sp1ke's Avatar
Sp1ke Sp1ke is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 617
Default

Err... how do you re-use the same photon? (And how do you tell it's the same photon and not a different one? They all look the same to me )
Surely you'll need to expend energy to bring it back for a second go.

If the photon is transferring its energy to drive the spaceship forwards, that energy is gone and you need to use more energy in the system to do the same trick again.
__________________
Spike
:)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2007, 04:32 PM
galacsi galacsi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW of Paris
Posts: 1,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sp1ke View Post
Err... how do you re-use the same photon? (And how do you tell it's the same photon and not a different one? They all look the same to me )
Surely you'll need to expend energy to bring it back for a second go.

If the photon is transferring its energy to drive the spaceship forwards, that energy is gone and you need to use more energy in the system to do the same trick again.
Not at all , a photon lose only a very small part of its energy when it collide an object. So it can theorically do it a number of time and then transfering a more important part of its energy.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2007, 05:17 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,011
Default

If I understand this contraption correctly, there are photons bouncing back and forth between the vehicle and the platform that is launching it. This can only work for a fairly short distance. Whatever acceleration will be applied must be done in the first few kilometers, or else huge configurable mirrors will be needed to keep the photons where they are supposed to go.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2007, 12:31 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antoniseb View Post
If I understand this contraption correctly, there are photons bouncing back and forth between the vehicle and the platform that is launching it. This can only work for a fairly short distance. Whatever acceleration will be applied must be done in the first few kilometers, or else huge configurable mirrors will be needed to keep the photons where they are supposed to go.
I didn't see the reflector scheme explained, but yes, that wouldn't go very far without problems, and the photons would redshift (lose energy) as the spacecraft/sail/reflector accelerated away, complicating things further.

I did see some mention of nanoprobes (low mass probes) which makes a bit more sense. And there's always the older idea of laserlaunch (where lasers are used to heat hydrogen or some other reaction mass) that probably is worth investigation.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2007, 04:00 PM
Sp1ke's Avatar
Sp1ke Sp1ke is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
a photon lose only a very small part of its energy when it collide an object
But as antoniseb says:
Quote:
there are photons bouncing back and forth
so the photon will transfer energy at both ends of its travel so if the first speeds up the spaceship, the second will slow it down by a similar amount. The only way this would work is if the photons are coming from a stationary launch platform and, as has been pointed out, this can't operate when the spaceship is a long way from its launch platform, nor can it be used to slow the ship down at the other end of its journey.
__________________
Spike
:)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-September-2007, 08:24 AM
galacsi galacsi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW of Paris
Posts: 1,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sp1ke View Post
But as antoniseb says:

so the photon will transfer energy at both ends of its travel so if the first speeds up the spaceship, the second will slow it down by a similar amount. The only way this would work is if the photons are coming from a stationary launch platform and, as has been pointed out, this can't operate when the spaceship is a long way from its launch platform, nor can it be used to slow the ship down at the other end of its journey.
What you write make sense . And it seems that it is a limited system.

But as they spoke of "resonant cavity" , I ask myself a question : is it possible to curb the photon like in an optical fiber , instead of a mirror and to use it again to move the rocket ? In this case the impulse is only one way and the photon is "milked" for it a great number of time , and so its energy is much better used .

I dont know if it is possible , may be wild speculation. Need more details about the contraption.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 01:40 AM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,473
Default

The way this thruster works is pretty simple to understand if you're familiar with laser technology. A traditional laser is a lasing medium between two mirrors. With this photonic laser thruster, the lasing medium and one endcap mirror are on board a "laser station". The other endcap mirror is on board the spacecraft. Both the laser station and the spacecraft need to keep the mirrors aimed precisely at each other.

Today's dielectric laser mirrors can efficiently reflect photons thousands of times, so the thrust is thousands of times greater than a laser sail which only uses each photon once. Note that if the relative velocity between the laser station and the spacecraft is great, then accumulated red-shift or blue-shift may be a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 09:08 AM
Sp1ke's Avatar
Sp1ke Sp1ke is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 617
Default

So this isn't a self-contained system? It relies on a base station that is in line-of-sight? How far could the ship get before it was too small a target for the laser?

And, more importantly, how does it slow down when it gets to its destination?
__________________
Spike
:)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 12:15 PM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,473
Default

Exactly, it relies on a base station. Ideally, there's a base station in orbit around both the source and the destination. Otherwise, some other method must be used to slow down at the destination.

The maximum range depends on the wavelength of light used and the diameter of the mirrors. Probably, the base station uses a much larger mirror since it doesn't have to go around being accelerated. So, let's assume a 10m mirror for the base station, a 2m mirror at the spacecraft, and a solar pumped NDd:YAG lasing medium at around 1 micron wavelength.

The diffraction limit is d=1.22wavelength f/a, so 2m = 1.22 * 1E-6m * f/10m. Thus, 20 * 1E6 /1.22 = f. Thus, the maximum range is around 16,000 kilometers.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 04:52 PM
Sp1ke's Avatar
Sp1ke Sp1ke is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 617
Default

So you can't use this approach for the first trip as there won't be a base station at the destination.

And 16,000k isn't all that far in galactic terms. Guess we haven't found the new route to the stars yet
__________________
Spike
:)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 05:48 PM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,473
Default

This drive is not suitable for interstellar journeys. At relativistic speeds, there's so much red-shifting on the first bounce that a second bounce isn't worth the trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 02:51 PM
galacsi galacsi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW of Paris
Posts: 1,149
Smile New info on Photonic thruster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacKuo View Post
This drive is not suitable for interstellar journeys. At relativistic speeds, there's so much red-shifting on the first bounce that a second bounce isn't worth the trouble.
Thank you for these explanations. It is more clearer now.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 05:08 PM
3rdvogon's Avatar
3rdvogon 3rdvogon is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portsea Island
Posts: 488
Default

OK call me simple minded but this sounds a bit like one of those old cartoons where a guy sits in a sailboat with an electric fan mounted in the stern blowing the air forwards to fill the boat's sails which in turn drives the boat forwards.
__________________
Note 1. All requests for planetary demolition must now be submitted in quadruplicate on form UX-565/B4 and be counter-signed by the assistant administrative officer for interstellar traffic calming - department QG-7. Subject to approval by the chief planning officer and the infrastructure development coordination sub-committee.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 05:13 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

So it's a cool idea, but not worth the effort in practical terms. A cheaper lightsail has more versatility.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 22-September-2007, 12:34 AM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rdvogon View Post
OK call me simple minded but this sounds a bit like one of those old cartoons where a guy sits in a sailboat with an electric fan mounted in the stern blowing the air forwards to fill the boat's sails which in turn drives the boat forwards.
If you put the electric fan on a fixed island instead of the stern, and you have two sails--one on the island and one on the sailboard, and if the wind is able to magically bounce back and forth between those sails as if the wind were laser light, then yeah...that's about it.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 22-September-2007, 12:41 AM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
So it's a cool idea, but not worth the effort in practical terms. A cheaper lightsail has more versatility.
There are two types of lightsail. One is a solar sail, which is limited to low thrust (although you can achieve some interesting possibilities with advanced sails if you do a Sun flyby). Another is a laser sail, which can be good for interstellar journeys but is extremely inefficient for interplanetary use.

This photonic laser thruster is thousands of times more efficient than a laser sail up to fast interplanetary travel speeds. It's less efficient than laser thermal for slow interplanetary travel speeds, but the same laser system can be used for both. Spacecraft could use both a laser thermal rocket as well as a photonic laser thruster mirror to get the advantages of both.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2007, 08:44 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,147
Default

I like the idea of that second bounce.

I wonder if a series of annular (ring shaped) disks passing off such a light craft like a subway would be possible within a starsystem. Sunlight, beamed light, and the light from such a thruster--it could all add up.

Such disks are located in certain paths and the vessel passes thru the hole in the center of each--building up speed.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2007, 10:19 PM
Zachary Zachary is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Posts: 400
Send a message via MSN to Zachary
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacKuo View Post
Exactly, it relies on a base station. Ideally, there's a base station in orbit around both the source and the destination. Otherwise, some other method must be used to slow down at the destination.
And that's a big problem in itself; if it's in orbit it won't be in the line of sight of the ship for half the time!
__________________
"Bessie Braddock to Churchill "Winston, your drunk!"
Churchill: "Bessie, you're ugly, and tomorrow morning I shall be sober""

the solar system
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2007, 10:23 PM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachary View Post
And that's a big problem in itself; if it's in orbit it won't be in the line of sight of the ship for half the time!
Only if the station is in LEO. But you're in a higher orbit, the Earth will never block more than a fraction of the time, and you can easily arrange things so that it's never blocking. Consider how rarely the Earth blocks the Sun's view of the Moon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moon landing Hoax? Lobreiter Conspiracy Theories 130 24-October-2007 12:08 AM
SR, ether, and Doppler shift grav Against the Mainstream 61 19-August-2006 03:17 PM
Travelling forever at the speed of light Flying Deuces Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 174 13-August-2006 06:09 PM
A Flaw of General Relativity, a Fix, etc. Zanket Against the Mainstream 580 10-December-2005 08:03 PM
lunar land barron? high velocity extraplanetary litterbug? i sacrelicious Astronomy 1 04-March-2003 01:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today