Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 22-February-2008, 11:59 PM
3488's Avatar
3488 3488 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom. 51 deg 8' North. 0 deg 53' East.
Posts: 116
Default Asteroid 25143 Itokawa.

Below are some images I have been working on, the Asteroid 25143 Itokawa from the JAXA Hayabusa spacecraft.

1). 25143 Itokawa from Home Position.

2). Closer full view.

3). Giant boulder (possibly a small moon once).

The remaining images are taken from VERY close to the surface of Asteroid 25143 Itokawa.

Asteroid 25143 Itokawa may be only 535 x 294 metres x 209 metres in size, but shows some interesting lighting & shadow effects with the surface rocks & dust.

It's quite amazing that this object can hold on to such loose stuff & the average desity of 1.95 g/cm3 seems to suggest that this object is a rubble pile held together by gravity.

Andrew Brown.
__________________
"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before". Linda Morabito on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-February-2008, 02:32 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 3,221
Default

Nice work andrew.

i am ways amazed by the sorted appearence of part of the asteroid's surface. if this was a scene out of a SF movie I would have labelled it unrealistuc.

Cheers

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-February-2008, 02:33 PM
3488's Avatar
3488 3488 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom. 51 deg 8' North. 0 deg 53' East.
Posts: 116
Default

Thanks Jon.

The image with the Univ of Tokyo identifier did not need much, just increased the contrast slightly.

The others, the originals on the JAXA site were quite flat, so they took quite a bit of work to bring out.

I have put a few more on below. Once again, the image with the Univ of Tokyo identifier did not need much, just increased the contrast slightly.

Andrew Brown.
__________________
"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before". Linda Morabito on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 24-February-2008, 04:44 AM
Squink Squink is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 565
Default

I'm surprised at how weathered the surface rocks look. There's just not many sharp fracture planes visible. I suppose low gravity collisons entail a lot of tumbling by the debris before it settles down again.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 24-February-2008, 07:24 AM
Trocisp Trocisp is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 399
Send a message via AIM to Trocisp Send a message via MSN to Trocisp Send a message via Skype™ to Trocisp
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squink View Post
I'm surprised at how weathered the surface rocks look. There's just not many sharp fracture planes visible. I suppose low gravity collisons entail a lot of tumbling by the debris before it settles down again.
I believe he said in the OP that it's basically a big pile of gravel that's bound together gravitationally.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24-February-2008, 04:02 PM
Squink Squink is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 565
Default

Your point being?
Looks to me like there's at least two major solid bodies in there.
It's also not immediately obvious how a low-G body of gravel would respond to collisions. On earth, you get a pretty inelastic collision when you toss a rock at a pile of pebbles. The smoothed faces on the rocks of 25143 might imply a more dynamic collision aftermath.

BTW, great images, 3488!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 24-February-2008, 08:51 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 10,036
Default

Cool stuff!
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The ULTIMATE astronomy quiz Glom Astronomy 4699 01-September-2009 05:12 AM
Is 1 Ceres still an Asteroid? (Wiki & IAU) kheider Astronomy 28 15-October-2006 10:14 AM
“Armageddon” or Not? thomastech Astronomy 27 23-November-2003 09:55 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today