Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 03:53 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,027
Default Obama on Space

Here is a link to an article about a recent speech that Obama gave in Titusville FLA about his plans for space.

Please note that this topic DOES fit into our exception for prohibition on political discussion, but it won't take much to get off the track. Let's keep this to facts about things that have been said by the main candidates (including Obama, McCain, Barr, and Nader) about the future of spaceflight and astronomy.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 04:13 PM
Launch window's Avatar
Launch window Launch window is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,994
Default

With the Shuttle nearing end and the VSE coming to a key crossroad in these latests rocket tests. What kind of expectations to people have for the new US Vice President. Will the next VP back NASA? Will they be a lot more supportive than say Al Gore or Dick Cheney?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 04:23 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antoniseb View Post
Here is a link to an article about a recent speech that Obama gave in Titusville FLA about his plans for space.
It sounds good.
A lot of what he says sounds like what NASA is there to begin with. So; it's great that he's not letting it drop.

But; He did say close the gap with only the phrase "continued funding".
Sure, I'm reading between the lines, but without those lines to read, how else do I take it?

And; what does he mean by private sector? Isn't the private sector involved as contractors now? Aren't there international partners now? Aren't they doing aviation research now? Aren't they studying the planet and climate now?

I think I need more information before passing any kind of a judgement.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 04:25 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Launch window View Post
... What kind of expectations to people have for the new US Vice President. Will the next VP back NASA?...
I don't think the VP will be very influential about how NASA is seen or supported. The real topic of this thread is what the presidential candidates HAVE said. Please try not to speculate about who might say what later.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 04:27 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
It sounds good.
...
I think I need more information before passing any kind of a judgement.
Yes, no question about that.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 07:34 PM
Nicolas's Avatar
Nicolas Nicolas is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 12,758
Default

What surprised me (in a good way) was that he did not only discuss the "S" but also the "A" of the National Administration. People tend to forget the "A" part...
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 07:43 PM
clint_dreamer clint_dreamer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Thanks for posting. I'm happy to hear that space exploration is something that Obama has on his mind already and I think his comments are very positive for NASA...if he makes it into office.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2008, 07:51 PM
novaderrik's Avatar
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henning, MN, USA
Posts: 3,542
Default

how does this jibe with speeches he gives in areas where NASA doesn't have some sort of a major presence?
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-August-2008, 01:53 PM
tofu tofu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: florida, USA
Posts: 2,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
Sure, I'm reading between the lines
Note that all political speeches are very carefully crafted to let you read whatever you want to read into them. Case in point, some people think that manned exploration is a big waste of time. Others see it as vitally important. Where does Obama stand? "I'll reestablish the National Aeronautics and Space Council so that we can develop a plan to explore the solar system – a plan that involves both human and robotic missions" So if you *want* to believe that he agrees with you, you can read that statement as agreement with your position regardless of what your position actually is. My conclusion: he didn't actually say anything of substance, and this is very typical of a political speech.

We wont really know how he feels about space exploration until we see the budget he proposes to Congress. I'm confident it's *way* down his list of priorities.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-August-2008, 02:04 PM
Robonaut Robonaut is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 28
Default

I agree that the statements are kind of vague.

Now, if Obama had said something like "I commit to doubling NASA's budget during my first year in office", then I would take more notice.

On the positive side, at least he didn't say that he was going to dismantle NASA and cease all space exploration efforts.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-August-2008, 02:54 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu View Post
Note that all political speeches are very carefully crafted to let you read whatever you want to read into them.
Yes; My point exactly...
I didn't think I needed to explain that part, I just wanted to point out the specifics of that vagueness.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-August-2008, 01:10 PM
samkent samkent is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 774
Default

Does anyone have any links to the other candidates space speeches? We shouldn’t assume that McCain will continue down the same path as the current admin.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-August-2008, 02:12 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 10,033
Default

It's good to see that he cares. After all, given current circumstances, the fact that we keep on hoping is quite audacious.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2008, 02:08 AM
matthewota matthewota is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Earth, Solar System, Orion spur, Orion Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Local Group
Posts: 935
Default

Obama sure changed his tune from a year ago, when he proposed deferring the Constellation Program for ten years in order to divert the funds to an "education initiative". Perhaps he did so after seeing that there are hundreds of thousands of aerospace workers that are also voters.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2008, 09:02 AM
Nicolas's Avatar
Nicolas Nicolas is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 12,758
Default

...or when he realised that project Apollo was one of the largest "education initiatives" ever. When saying "education" you need to think about more people than children only. Apollo was one huge engineering educational program thousands and thousands of people in the USA. Of course, it was more than just education. Win-win. Nicolas For President
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2008, 06:27 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,181
Default

I don't believe Obama myself.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2008, 09:45 PM
cjl's Avatar
cjl cjl is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: University of Colorado - Boulder
Posts: 2,647
Default

Why?
__________________
WANTED:

Schroedinger's Cat

Dead And Alive
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2008, 10:40 PM
Tinaa Tinaa is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 3,799
Default

This is one of the few topics that allows political discussion. Let's keep it focused.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2008, 10:45 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,032
Default

To be totally clear, Obama's credibility is not a legitimate topic for discussion on this forum. His space policy, however, is.

ToSeek
BAUT Forum Moderator
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2008, 04:46 AM
ryanmercer's Avatar
ryanmercer ryanmercer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Greater Helium, Barsoom (Speedway, IN)
Posts: 664
Send a message via AIM to ryanmercer Send a message via Yahoo to ryanmercer
Default

Thanks for sharing the link... I'd add my two cents, but I know I won't be able to keep it non-political, so I'll just hold my tongue.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2008, 05:20 AM
Tensor Tensor is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sarasota Fl
Posts: 3,687
Default

Ya know, the BA has a comment on the differences between McCain and Obama on his blog, here
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

Neptune- The original Dark Matter.

The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2008, 07:36 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,022
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samkent View Post
Does anyone have any links to the other candidates space speeches? We shouldn’t assume that McCain will continue down the same path as the current admin.
I haven't seen anything from McCain recently, but the last statement McCain made was limited to solely talking about keeping the SDI (i.e. Reagan's "Star Wars" program or whatever its being called now) going. That's it.

I note that as I predicted (many times here) that Obama's talking about extending shuttle flights. While I don't like the idea of the shuttles no longer flying, I know that they have to be grounded (and grounded soon) as its only a matter of time before another one explodes or has another fatal accident.

What NASA needs, and needs desperately, is a budget boost. Adjusting for inflation, their budget is currently $3 billion/yr in 1966 dollars. If NASA doesn't get it, its likely NASA won't be going back to the Moon before 2030 or so (private companies are another matter).
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04 K.I.L.L. S.M.U.R.F.S.
Tuckers! Automotive Oddities! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither. MachineCast Save the planet, by leaving it! "To be second in space is to be second in everything," LBJ.

Last edited by Tuckerfan; 09-August-2008 at 07:45 AM.. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2008, 09:17 AM
bunker9603's Avatar
bunker9603 bunker9603 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samkent View Post
Does anyone have any links to the other candidates space speeches? We shouldn’t assume that McCain will continue down the same path as the current admin.
STATEMENT OF SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN ON S. 1745/H.R. 3093, THE COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE FY 08 APPROPRIATIONS BILL

http://mccain.senate.gov/public/inde...9-601D22074F97

"Since the bill has been brought to the floor, over $1 billion worth of spending has been added. Specifically, the Senate voted to add $1 billion on top of the $10 billion the bill already provided to NASA. I continue to support NASA and space research, but at what cost to our nation’s children who will inherit the largest national debt this country has seen?
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2008, 09:47 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,022
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bunker9603 View Post
STATEMENT OF SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN ON S. 1745/H.R. 3093, THE COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE FY 08 APPROPRIATIONS BILL

http://mccain.senate.gov/public/inde...9-601D22074F97

"Since the bill has been brought to the floor, over $1 billion worth of spending has been added. Specifically, the Senate voted to add $1 billion on top of the $10 billion the bill already provided to NASA. I continue to support NASA and space research, but at what cost to our nation’s children who will inherit the largest national debt this country has seen?
Wow. One could say all kinds of things to that. I can't think of too many of them which would fit within the board's rules, so I'll just remain quiet.
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04 K.I.L.L. S.M.U.R.F.S.
Tuckers! Automotive Oddities! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither. MachineCast Save the planet, by leaving it! "To be second in space is to be second in everything," LBJ.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2008, 08:00 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 10,033
Default

Quote:
Perhaps he did so after seeing that there are hundreds of thousands of aerospace workers that are also voters.
Maybe. But whatever the reason, I'm happy!
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10-August-2008, 06:33 AM
novaderrik's Avatar
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henning, MN, USA
Posts: 3,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
Maybe. But whatever the reason, I'm happy!
some day, maybe you will learn to never be happy whenever a presidential candidate says something that appeals to you during an election year- especially if it plays on your emotions.
generally, they will say anything to get elected- even if it contradicts things they said in front of a different crowd a few weeks before.
this is called "pandering", and their promises usually last no longer than a week or two- or what's called a "news cycle".
then, they will find a reason to "rethink their position due to new information" that they have received, or figure out a way to explain how what they said before isn't exactly what they really meant to say.
this way, some people will only remember the things that they said that agree with their own personal opinions while making it look like they have an open mind and adapt their viewpoints based on changing circumstances.

now, if a politician was to have a 30 year track record of backing NASA and they were to make consistent promises about their vision for NASA during their tenure as president if they are elected, then it might be time to get a little bit excited.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 10-August-2008, 05:35 PM
Romanus Romanus is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,653
Default

^
Ditto--which is why I'm paying zero attention to what either candidate says about space exploration until Inauguration Day.
__________________
"Call me old-fashioned, but I think fire is magic. And it scares me a lot."

--The State
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2008, 12:17 AM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 10,033
Default

Dude, I've got a lot of summer homework, I NEED something to be happy about.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2008, 03:40 PM
tofu tofu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: florida, USA
Posts: 2,568
Default

From the universe today blog:
Quote:
Saturday's statement was followed by some detailed text on Obama's campaign blog outlining his priorities for the US dominance in space, the possibility of extending the Shuttle's operations and speeding up development of the Constellation program
Whoa, I love the shuttle and all but it's time to let the old girl die. Why would he even suggest that? I think it's another example of what I pointed out in my previous post to this thread. Politicians don't say what they believe, they say whatever makes people like them. This statement about supporting both the shuttle and constellation is a carefully crafted ploy to make everyone happy all the time. His interns and speech writers figured out that some people like the shuttle and some people like Constellation. So he makes a speech where he says he likes both.

As a pessimist, I predict the following: whoever is elected president will do the easy thing - he'll throw money at the shuttle so that he can have empty, meaningless fireworks to entertain the public. "look everyone, I support NASA, see the shuttle? do you see it? isn't it pretty?" He'll cancel Constellation because it doesn't look good and it's not going to fly during his presidency anyway. Why should he support something that doesn't give him a photo opportunity? Plus, it's easy to cancel a project that nobody has seen anything from except models, and it's easy to justify it. "Orion's parachute didn't work, the whole project was a failure!"

A truly visionary leader would say, "I'm going to support a project that has a future, and phase out the shuttle, which, though successful, has outlived its usefulness." But the difference between a politician and a leader is that a leader goes in one direction, even if it's not the popular direction. A politician goes every which way in order to maximize immediate popularity. A good leader is the one who picks the right direction. A good politician is the one that everybody likes.

Also, I'm grouchy on monday mornings.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2008, 03:49 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,053
Default

Off-topic: for some reason, every time I see the title of this thread my mischievous brain insists on half-misreading it as "Obama in space". (Reminiscences of The Muppet Show? ) I guess after his grand tour of Europe and the Middle East, space would be the next logical destination.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Privatization of Space The Bad Astronomer Space Exploration 177 28-August-2009 08:13 PM
The Future to Exploration of Space StarLab Astronomy 31 18-August-2005 01:05 AM
Favourite astronomy book(s) kashi Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 40 10-June-2004 10:36 AM
100+ Space products and services cygonaut Space Exploration 0 07-October-2003 10:55 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today