|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Here is a link to an article about a recent speech that Obama gave in Titusville FLA about his plans for space.
Please note that this topic DOES fit into our exception for prohibition on political discussion, but it won't take much to get off the track. Let's keep this to facts about things that have been said by the main candidates (including Obama, McCain, Barr, and Nader) about the future of spaceflight and astronomy.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak |
|
||||
|
Quote:
A lot of what he says sounds like what NASA is there to begin with. So; it's great that he's not letting it drop. But; He did say close the gap with only the phrase "continued funding". Sure, I'm reading between the lines, but without those lines to read, how else do I take it? And; what does he mean by private sector? Isn't the private sector involved as contractors now? Aren't there international partners now? Aren't they doing aviation research now? Aren't they studying the planet and climate now? I think I need more information before passing any kind of a judgement.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me) |
|
||||
|
I don't think the VP will be very influential about how NASA is seen or supported. The real topic of this thread is what the presidential candidates HAVE said. Please try not to speculate about who might say what later.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak |
|
||||
|
What surprised me (in a good way) was that he did not only discuss the "S" but also the "A" of the National Administration. People tend to forget the "A" part...
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name. |
|
||||
|
how does this jibe with speeches he gives in areas where NASA doesn't have some sort of a major presence?
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion The.. Best.. Thread..Ever... |
|
|||
|
Note that all political speeches are very carefully crafted to let you read whatever you want to read into them. Case in point, some people think that manned exploration is a big waste of time. Others see it as vitally important. Where does Obama stand? "I'll reestablish the National Aeronautics and Space Council so that we can develop a plan to explore the solar system – a plan that involves both human and robotic missions" So if you *want* to believe that he agrees with you, you can read that statement as agreement with your position regardless of what your position actually is. My conclusion: he didn't actually say anything of substance, and this is very typical of a political speech.
We wont really know how he feels about space exploration until we see the budget he proposes to Congress. I'm confident it's *way* down his list of priorities. |
|
|||
|
I agree that the statements are kind of vague.
Now, if Obama had said something like "I commit to doubling NASA's budget during my first year in office", then I would take more notice. On the positive side, at least he didn't say that he was going to dismantle NASA and cease all space exploration efforts. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I didn't think I needed to explain that part, I just wanted to point out the specifics of that vagueness.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me) |
|
||||
|
It's good to see that he cares. After all, given current circumstances, the fact that we keep on hoping is quite audacious.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
|||
|
Obama sure changed his tune from a year ago, when he proposed deferring the Constellation Program for ten years in order to divert the funds to an "education initiative". Perhaps he did so after seeing that there are hundreds of thousands of aerospace workers that are also voters.
|
|
||||
|
...or when he realised that project Apollo was one of the largest "education initiatives" ever. When saying "education" you need to think about more people than children only. Apollo was one huge engineering educational program thousands and thousands of people in the USA. Of course, it was more than just education. Win-win.
Nicolas For President ![]()
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name. |
|
|||
|
This is one of the few topics that allows political discussion. Let's keep it focused.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein |
|
||||
|
To be totally clear, Obama's credibility is not a legitimate topic for discussion on this forum. His space policy, however, is.
ToSeek BAUT Forum Moderator
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
Thanks for sharing the link... I'd add my two cents, but I know I won't be able to keep it non-political, so I'll just hold my tongue.
__________________
-The Wolf http://www.ryanmercer.com http://www.youtube.com/user/ryanmercer317 http://www.pleasegodhelpme.org |
|
|||
|
Ya know, the BA has a comment on the differences between McCain and Obama on his blog, here
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues. Neptune- The original Dark Matter. The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I note that as I predicted (many times here) that Obama's talking about extending shuttle flights. While I don't like the idea of the shuttles no longer flying, I know that they have to be grounded (and grounded soon) as its only a matter of time before another one explodes or has another fatal accident. What NASA needs, and needs desperately, is a budget boost. Adjusting for inflation, their budget is currently $3 billion/yr in 1966 dollars. If NASA doesn't get it, its likely NASA won't be going back to the Moon before 2030 or so (private companies are another matter).
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04 K.I.L.L. S.M.U.R.F.S. Tuckers! Automotive Oddities! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither. MachineCast Save the planet, by leaving it! "To be second in space is to be second in everything," LBJ. Last edited by Tuckerfan; 09-August-2008 at 07:45 AM.. Reason: typo |
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://mccain.senate.gov/public/inde...9-601D22074F97 "Since the bill has been brought to the floor, over $1 billion worth of spending has been added. Specifically, the Senate voted to add $1 billion on top of the $10 billion the bill already provided to NASA. I continue to support NASA and space research, but at what cost to our nation’s children who will inherit the largest national debt this country has seen? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04 K.I.L.L. S.M.U.R.F.S. Tuckers! Automotive Oddities! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither. MachineCast Save the planet, by leaving it! "To be second in space is to be second in everything," LBJ. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
||||
|
some day, maybe you will learn to never be happy whenever a presidential candidate says something that appeals to you during an election year- especially if it plays on your emotions.
generally, they will say anything to get elected- even if it contradicts things they said in front of a different crowd a few weeks before. this is called "pandering", and their promises usually last no longer than a week or two- or what's called a "news cycle". then, they will find a reason to "rethink their position due to new information" that they have received, or figure out a way to explain how what they said before isn't exactly what they really meant to say. this way, some people will only remember the things that they said that agree with their own personal opinions while making it look like they have an open mind and adapt their viewpoints based on changing circumstances. now, if a politician was to have a 30 year track record of backing NASA and they were to make consistent promises about their vision for NASA during their tenure as president if they are elected, then it might be time to get a little bit excited.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion The.. Best.. Thread..Ever... |
|
|||
|
^
Ditto--which is why I'm paying zero attention to what either candidate says about space exploration until Inauguration Day.
__________________
"Call me old-fashioned, but I think fire is magic. And it scares me a lot." --The State |
|
||||
|
Dude, I've got a lot of summer homework, I NEED something to be happy about.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
|||
|
From the universe today blog:
Quote:
As a pessimist, I predict the following: whoever is elected president will do the easy thing - he'll throw money at the shuttle so that he can have empty, meaningless fireworks to entertain the public. "look everyone, I support NASA, see the shuttle? do you see it? isn't it pretty?" He'll cancel Constellation because it doesn't look good and it's not going to fly during his presidency anyway. Why should he support something that doesn't give him a photo opportunity? Plus, it's easy to cancel a project that nobody has seen anything from except models, and it's easy to justify it. "Orion's parachute didn't work, the whole project was a failure!" A truly visionary leader would say, "I'm going to support a project that has a future, and phase out the shuttle, which, though successful, has outlived its usefulness." But the difference between a politician and a leader is that a leader goes in one direction, even if it's not the popular direction. A politician goes every which way in order to maximize immediate popularity. A good leader is the one who picks the right direction. A good politician is the one that everybody likes. Also, I'm grouchy on monday mornings. |
|
|||
|
Off-topic: for some reason, every time I see the title of this thread my mischievous brain insists on half-misreading it as "Obama in space". (Reminiscences of The Muppet Show?
) I guess after his grand tour of Europe and the Middle East, space would be the next logical destination. ![]()
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire. "All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Privatization of Space | The Bad Astronomer | Space Exploration | 177 | 28-August-2009 08:13 PM |
| The Future to Exploration of Space | StarLab | Astronomy | 31 | 18-August-2005 01:05 AM |
| Favourite astronomy book(s) | kashi | Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories | 40 | 10-June-2004 10:36 AM |
| 100+ Space products and services | cygonaut | Space Exploration | 0 | 07-October-2003 10:55 PM |