Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-July-2003, 06:56 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,399
Default

SUMMARY: The European Space Agency's SMART-1 mission will use a revolutionary ion engine to help it search for evidence that the Moon was formed after a violent collision of a smaller planet with the Earth. An ion engine works by accelerating ionized particles of gas in a constant stream for months or even years. Although the thrust is very low, it's very efficient and requires a fraction of fuel that traditional rockets use.


Comments or questions about this story? Feel free to share your thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30-July-2003, 06:58 PM
Bjarne's Avatar
Bjarne Bjarne is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 25
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong Fraser, but didn't NASA send a craft out wiht that kind of drive?? And if so, whatever happened to it?
__________________
Clear Skies All!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 30-July-2003, 07:50 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,399
Default

NASA sent out a spacecraft called Deep Space 1. Its purpose was to test out various space technologies, including an ion drive. The spacecraft was retired in December 2001.

Here's a link to the mission:
http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/
__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2003, 12:48 AM
Josh's Avatar
Josh Josh is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,838
Send a message via MSN to Josh
Default

So what then makes this euro ion drive more revolutionary than the NASA one? And how successful was this ion drive? were they testing for its potential for future use or what? I'd imagine (and yes I know this is just sci-fi) that if Warp 1 had just been reached on a spacecraft the news of it wouldn't have disappeared into oblivion.
__________________
1·618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805 76286213544862270526046281890244970720720418939113 74
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2003, 12:53 AM
Josh's Avatar
Josh Josh is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,838
Send a message via MSN to Josh
Default

And then I read about the ion drive tests that have been ongoing since 1998. NASA really should write and tell me these things.
__________________
1·618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805 76286213544862270526046281890244970720720418939113 74
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2003, 02:17 AM
Ray Bauernhuber Ray Bauernhuber is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2
Default

Ahem, and are we still looking to use kerosene as a primary fuel source?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2003, 04:42 AM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,399
Default

The DS1 ion drive was the first one to head into space, I believe, but it was just a prototype platform to test all kinds of different space technologies.

But now spacecraft are actually being built to use an ion drive as their main form of propulsion. It's becoming the new space engine.

Very cool.
__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 19-August-2003, 06:19 PM
phil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just a little sniglet here;
I've heard that there is a workable theory concerning WARP drive in that because there isnt any type of metal container that can hold the subsequent blast from driving matter/anti matter particles together, how ever there is a theory on using an electro magnetic energy field to contain the reaction and there by direct the stream.The byproduct being of course Warp drive ....hmmmmm intertesting in theory <_<
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 22-August-2003, 03:05 PM
Bobby Moulton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by phil@Aug 19 2003, 05:19 PM
Just a little sniglet here;
I've heard that there is a workable theory concerning WARP drive in that because there isnt any type of metal container that can hold the subsequent blast from driving matter/anti matter particles together, how ever there is a theory on using an electro magnetic energy field to contain the reaction and there by direct the stream.The byproduct being of course Warp drive ....hmmmmm intertesting in theory <_<
I think ion drive is an exellent way to travel space quickly and effecently. It creates a form of poplusion with virtially no harmful waste product. An ingenius idea finally being put to work.And what about warp drive? I mean, any steel alloy we have wouldn't be strong enough to contain the matter/antimatter explosion like you said. But the theory on using a magnetic field to contain the explosion is ingenius.But, there is one problem... how would you contain antimatter in a matter based containment field without it causing an unwanted catasrophic explosion? They never tell you how they do it in Startrek. Although, if we do create a way to make it work it would be a giant leap in space travel. Very interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 22-August-2003, 06:08 PM
rocketa rocketa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Default

"Warp Drive" is a super-luminal (faster than light) propulsion concept and has nothing to do with the energy source. it uses a method so far elusive to current scientific thinking. It is fictional.

No matter how much power you have (and anti-matter/matter annihilation would be pretty powerful!) you can't do faster than light in the context of current physics.

However, it does not mean that there might be an astounding discovery in our future that would allow that to happen.

A real scientist doesn't say "No, Never!" but "Probably not, maybe!" .
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 22-August-2003, 11:51 PM
WendellG WendellG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burns, Oregon
Posts: 81
Send a message via MSN to WendellG
Default

It has been my understanding that so far, ion drive propulsion isn't very powerful. That is why we haven't used it. Have there been some new technologies brought on board to make this a usable type of drive?

Wendell
__________________
Semper Fidelis
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2003, 12:02 AM
Bobby Moulton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by rocketa@Aug 22 2003, 05:08 PM
"Warp Drive" is a super-luminal (faster than light) propulsion concept and has nothing to do with the energy source. it uses a method so far elusive to current scientific thinking. It is fictional.

No matter how much power you have (and anti-matter/matter annihilation would be pretty powerful!) you can't do faster than light in the context of current physics.

However, it does not mean that there might be an astounding discovery in our future that would allow that to happen.

A real scientist doesn't say "No, Never!" but "Probably not, maybe!" .
I know that now 'Warp Drive' is most surely unacheiveable but some day in the far future we might create a way to make it happen.It's just out of our perspective of technology.At this moment 'Ion Drive' is obviously the fastest and most effecent way of space travel and it will be for quite a while. B)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2003, 09:35 PM
imported_Voyager imported_Voyager is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bobby Moulton@Aug 22 2003, 11:02 PM

I know that now 'Warp Drive' is most surely unacheiveable but some day in the far future we might create a way to make it happen.It's just out of our perspective of technology.At this moment 'Ion Drive' is obviously the fastest and most effecent way of space travel and it will be for quite a while. B)
How could you break the light barrier with matter (you and the starship)if the barrier is matter? That would be like trying to break the sound barrier with sound waves! The second we reach light speed we would fly apart because we would be going faster than our atoms are traveling. It might be possible, just beyond our under standing. B)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 29-August-2003, 12:48 AM
Duane's Avatar
Duane Duane is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 2,787
Send a message via MSN to Duane
Default

Quote:
It has been my understanding that so far, ion drive propulsion isn't very powerful. That is why we haven't used it. Have there been some new technologies brought on board to make this a usable type of drive?
You are correct that ion drive is not very powerful. If fact, at maximum thrust, an ion drive engine would only have enough force to maybe lift a single piece of paper.

The trick behind ion drive is not power, it's endurance. Although the actual force of thrust is low, the thrust is continuous. Given that there is no friction in space, that means that the thrust builds constantly.

With enough time, the ion drive can push a craft to incredible speeds.

With the success of DS1, ion drive is now an accepted technology, such that some new craft will use it as their primary propulsion. Note that the craft will still need to be boosted into earth orbit, and will also require chemical propellant for use in it's manuvering jets.
__________________
All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct.~ Carl Sagan ~

Humanity must rise above the Earth, to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only then will we fully understand the world in which we live.~Socrates, 500 B.C. ~

Let every man judge according to his own standards, by what he has himself read, not by what others tell him. ~Albert Einstein~
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 29-August-2003, 04:06 AM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,399
Default

The ion drive is also efficient. When you're in space, all that really matters is how much mass you can throw off your spacecraft at what velocity. Chemical rockets force material out the exhaust nozzle, but it needs to carry everything with it into space. In the case of the ion drive, it uses an electromagnetic field to fire single ions at tremendous velocities; and it creates the energy to do this from solar power, so it doesn't need to carry any fuel other than the ions that are going to be accelerated.

Very clever technology and I'm sure it will become a mainstay on pretty much every deep space mission from now on.
__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-September-2003, 11:46 PM
phil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Duane@Aug 28 2003, 11:48 PM
Quote:
It has been my understanding that so far, ion drive propulsion isn't very powerful. That is why we haven't used it. Have there been some new technologies brought on board to make this a usable type of drive?
You are correct that ion drive is not very powerful. If fact, at maximum thrust, an ion drive engine would only have enough force to maybe lift a single piece of paper.

The trick behind ion drive is not power, it's endurance. Although the actual force of thrust is low, the thrust is continuous. Given that there is no friction in space, that means that the thrust builds constantly.

With enough time, the ion drive can push a craft to incredible speeds.

With the success of DS1, ion drive is now an accepted technology, such that some new craft will use it as their primary propulsion. Note that the craft will still need to be boosted into earth orbit, and will also require chemical propellant for use in it's manuvering jets.
<_< Now we are getting some place, lets see....Ion drive is continuous not powerful but contiuous, now given no limit to distance or destinationand since Ion drive is constant and that continues to build more speed ,and since such a craft is being propelled in the vaccum of space, could we not assume that eventually we would attain incredable speeds....say almost the of light, or better hmmm sound almost like warp drive eventually :wacko:
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-September-2003, 11:57 PM
phil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bobby Moulton+Aug 22 2003, 02:05 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Bobby Moulton @ Aug 22 2003, 02:05 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-phil@Aug 19 2003, 05:19 PM
Just a little sniglet here;
I've heard that there is a workable theory concerning WARP drive in that because there isnt any type of metal container that can hold the subsequent blast from driving matter/anti matter particles together, how ever there is a theory on using an electro magnetic energy field to contain the reaction and there by direct the stream.The byproduct being of course Warp drive ....hmmmmm intertesting in theory <_<
I think ion drive is an exellent way to travel space quickly and effecently. It creates a form of poplusion with virtially no harmful waste product. An ingenius idea finally being put to work.And what about warp drive? I mean, any steel alloy we have wouldn't be strong enough to contain the matter/antimatter explosion like you said. But the theory on using a magnetic field to contain the explosion is ingenius.But, there is one problem... how would you contain antimatter in a matter based containment field without it causing an unwanted catasrophic explosion? They never tell you how they do it in Startrek. Although, if we do create a way to make it work it would be a giant leap in space travel. Very interesting. [/b][/quote]
Based on my very, very ,limited knowledge of warp physics, it was my understanding that a E.M. field is nuetral in its particle make up, that is how it can contain both matter
anti matter fuels.This being said the matter is contained in one tank, and the anti matter contained in a another tank,it is then injected into shall we say a futuristic "venturi" engine which of course has a E.M.field in the venturi jet ,forcing the initial controled explosion out the back sa it were :blink:
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 14-September-2003, 07:59 PM
johnny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

if you strapped several of the ion drives together, say,1000, given that technology gets smaller and there is no fuel usage problem would that increaes acceleration by 1000?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 16-September-2003, 10:17 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,399
Default

Well there's a top end, which is how fast you can accelerate the ions out of the spacecraft. I think you can get as high as 10% the speed of light using this method.
__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2003, 04:38 AM
phil to bobby moulton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

to answer your question, the containment of the Matter /antimatter in a magnectic field could in theory,be acheived by enclosing the M/AM in a field with only one direction for the insuing explosion to vent.Having said this the magnetic field would of course need to be neutral in its make up being niether positive or negative,the field of course being shall we say the mediator between the two forces.
The M.F. would indeed need to surround the injection of both matters in a full unbroken sphere except where the vent would be situated.
If this simplified theory is workable, i dont think it would be advisable to carry out the first test on the ground,i would have the first experiment a generous distance from the planet, because if it went wrong i would not want to anywhere within 100.000 miles from the blast area
However if it is successful you have about one nanosecond to see the result, because there would be nothing to see except ....nothing. the experiment would have gone to light speed :unsure:
ps. dont be standing in the opposite direction of the vent opening :blink:
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2003, 10:05 AM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,713
Default

You can travel light years in less than a second, thats by using a wormhole.

The SMART-1 Ion Engine craft is taking the long way round, but it is using much less fuel to do so. I wonder where Ion Drive technology will take us...
__________________
MacTalk - The Australian Apple Community - iPod, iPhone and Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2003, 10:05 AM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,713
Default

...and when...
__________________
MacTalk - The Australian Apple Community - iPod, iPhone and Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-October-2003, 11:35 PM
Phil to Mathew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I totaly Agree Matt, however I Think we as a species are much closer to finding the solution to WARP drive than we are finding /creating a workable worm hole, keeping in mind that ION drive is great, but getting to any speed remotely close to the speed of light would take years. <_<

Having said this: Questions

USING ION DRIVE THROUGH THE YEARS APROACHING LIGHT SPEED, WOULD I GET OLDER FASTER? OR IS SPACE/TIME RELATIVE TO MY POSITION, THEREFORE DO I GET OLDER NORMALY.
ALSO DOES TIME REMAIN CONSTANT AT MY POINT OF ORIGIN? OR DOES IT SPEED UP

SORRY MATT JUST THINKING OUT LOUD
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today