|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
NASA sent out a spacecraft called Deep Space 1. Its purpose was to test out various space technologies, including an ion drive. The spacecraft was retired in December 2001.
Here's a link to the mission: http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/
__________________
Fraser Cain Publisher Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday. |
|
||||
|
So what then makes this euro ion drive more revolutionary than the NASA one? And how successful was this ion drive? were they testing for its potential for future use or what? I'd imagine (and yes I know this is just sci-fi) that if Warp 1 had just been reached on a spacecraft the news of it wouldn't have disappeared into oblivion.
__________________
1·618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805 76286213544862270526046281890244970720720418939113 74 |
|
||||
|
The DS1 ion drive was the first one to head into space, I believe, but it was just a prototype platform to test all kinds of different space technologies.
But now spacecraft are actually being built to use an ion drive as their main form of propulsion. It's becoming the new space engine. Very cool.
__________________
Fraser Cain Publisher Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday. |
|
|||
|
Just a little sniglet here;
I've heard that there is a workable theory concerning WARP drive in that because there isnt any type of metal container that can hold the subsequent blast from driving matter/anti matter particles together, how ever there is a theory on using an electro magnetic energy field to contain the reaction and there by direct the stream.The byproduct being of course Warp drive ....hmmmmm intertesting in theory <_< |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
"Warp Drive" is a super-luminal (faster than light) propulsion concept and has nothing to do with the energy source. it uses a method so far elusive to current scientific thinking. It is fictional.
No matter how much power you have (and anti-matter/matter annihilation would be pretty powerful!) you can't do faster than light in the context of current physics. However, it does not mean that there might be an astounding discovery in our future that would allow that to happen. A real scientist doesn't say "No, Never!" but "Probably not, maybe!" . |
|
|||
|
It has been my understanding that so far, ion drive propulsion isn't very powerful. That is why we haven't used it. Have there been some new technologies brought on board to make this a usable type of drive?
Wendell
__________________
Semper Fidelis |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
The trick behind ion drive is not power, it's endurance. Although the actual force of thrust is low, the thrust is continuous. Given that there is no friction in space, that means that the thrust builds constantly. With enough time, the ion drive can push a craft to incredible speeds. With the success of DS1, ion drive is now an accepted technology, such that some new craft will use it as their primary propulsion. Note that the craft will still need to be boosted into earth orbit, and will also require chemical propellant for use in it's manuvering jets.
__________________
All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct.~ Carl Sagan ~ Humanity must rise above the Earth, to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only then will we fully understand the world in which we live.~Socrates, 500 B.C. ~ Let every man judge according to his own standards, by what he has himself read, not by what others tell him. ~Albert Einstein~ |
|
||||
|
The ion drive is also efficient. When you're in space, all that really matters is how much mass you can throw off your spacecraft at what velocity. Chemical rockets force material out the exhaust nozzle, but it needs to carry everything with it into space. In the case of the ion drive, it uses an electromagnetic field to fire single ions at tremendous velocities; and it creates the energy to do this from solar power, so it doesn't need to carry any fuel other than the ions that are going to be accelerated.
Very clever technology and I'm sure it will become a mainstay on pretty much every deep space mission from now on.
__________________
Fraser Cain Publisher Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Based on my very, very ,limited knowledge of warp physics, it was my understanding that a E.M. field is nuetral in its particle make up, that is how it can contain both matter anti matter fuels.This being said the matter is contained in one tank, and the anti matter contained in a another tank,it is then injected into shall we say a futuristic "venturi" engine which of course has a E.M.field in the venturi jet ,forcing the initial controled explosion out the back sa it were :blink: |
|
||||
|
Well there's a top end, which is how fast you can accelerate the ions out of the spacecraft. I think you can get as high as 10% the speed of light using this method.
__________________
Fraser Cain Publisher Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday. |
|
|||
|
to answer your question, the containment of the Matter /antimatter in a magnectic field could in theory,be acheived by enclosing the M/AM in a field with only one direction for the insuing explosion to vent.Having said this the magnetic field would of course need to be neutral in its make up being niether positive or negative,the field of course being shall we say the mediator between the two forces.
The M.F. would indeed need to surround the injection of both matters in a full unbroken sphere except where the vent would be situated. If this simplified theory is workable, i dont think it would be advisable to carry out the first test on the ground,i would have the first experiment a generous distance from the planet, because if it went wrong i would not want to anywhere within 100.000 miles from the blast area However if it is successful you have about one nanosecond to see the result, because there would be nothing to see except ....nothing. the experiment would have gone to light speed :unsure: ps. dont be standing in the opposite direction of the vent opening :blink: |
|
|||
|
You can travel light years in less than a second, thats by using a wormhole.
The SMART-1 Ion Engine craft is taking the long way round, but it is using much less fuel to do so. I wonder where Ion Drive technology will take us...
__________________
MacTalk - The Australian Apple Community - iPod, iPhone and Mac. |
|
|||
|
I totaly Agree Matt, however I Think we as a species are much closer to finding the solution to WARP drive than we are finding /creating a workable worm hole, keeping in mind that ION drive is great, but getting to any speed remotely close to the speed of light would take years. <_<
Having said this: Questions USING ION DRIVE THROUGH THE YEARS APROACHING LIGHT SPEED, WOULD I GET OLDER FASTER? OR IS SPACE/TIME RELATIVE TO MY POSITION, THEREFORE DO I GET OLDER NORMALY. ALSO DOES TIME REMAIN CONSTANT AT MY POINT OF ORIGIN? OR DOES IT SPEED UP SORRY MATT JUST THINKING OUT LOUD ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|