Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-April-2004, 09:02 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,021
Default

SUMMARY: On March 22, 2004, the ESA/NASA SOHO solar observatory spacecraft observed its 750th comet since its launch in late 1995. SOHO has a special instrument that blocks out the glare of the Sun, and allows it to see comets that graze the Sun. Amateur astronomers from around the world analyze the photographs taken by SOHO, which are published on the Internet - more than 75% of the discoveries have been made by amateurs. This one was discovered by Sebastian Hönig from Germany.

What do you think about this story? Post your comments below.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-April-2004, 10:43 PM
om@umr.edu om@umr.edu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,234
Default

This is an interesting story, Fraser.

Trajectories of comets may contain information on the birth of the solar system.

Has anyone back-calculated from the number presently observed, and the probability of capture by the Sun or another planet, to estimate the number of these objects 4-5 billion years ago?

With kind regards,

Oliver
http://www.umr.edu/~om

PS - The origin and composition of the Sun may be related to the trajectories established for comets at the birth of the solar system. See the ongoing discussion at:
http://www.universetoday.com/forum/i...iew=getnewpost
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-April-2004, 09:12 AM
isferno's Avatar
isferno isferno is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 455
Default

I've got a question,

in the gif movie which you can find here (603Kb) on October 24, 2003 (01:00 am) you can see towards the top of the sun an impact like feature which dissapates within 24 hours.

Is this an actual impact or is this caused by something else?
__________________
Have you found the loop or the loophole?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-April-2004, 08:02 PM
Nick4 Nick4 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 580
Default

Thas a lot of comets to find in such little time i have a question can this equitment be soled to amature astronomers like me so i can find comets. B)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-April-2004, 09:28 PM
Mettalica1 Mettalica1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 79
Default

cool i think this is interesting
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-April-2004, 02:00 AM
damienpaul damienpaul is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,804
Default

Surely that couldn't be an impact feature isferno,i mean the comet would frizzle up in the sun's corona, wouldn't it? perhaps it is the shockwave? or maybe totally unrelated?

Am i missing something?
__________________
Damien,
International Baccalaureate Physics teacher
Optics, Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Instrumentation Major
Admin: Pacific Science and Art
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-April-2004, 05:58 AM
isferno's Avatar
isferno isferno is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 455
Default

I wouldn't know Damienpaul, but its shape isn't the tipical outgassing of a upraising gasbubble as you can see in the overall picture.

It also does produces a shockwave feature as seen with the new eruption north of the equator a couple of days later, though smaller (only 1 frame I believe)

The first thing it did remind me of was of a demonstration during science class where the teacher demonstrates what happens if a charged particle enters a petridish filled with condens.
But that would be definitely not be it. (unless a very very large charged particle)
__________________
Have you found the loop or the loophole?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2004, 10:36 AM
isferno's Avatar
isferno isferno is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 455
Default

I've forwarded the question to "Dr Soho"

I'm very curius as to what it might be. I'll post their answer here.
__________________
Have you found the loop or the loophole?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 19-April-2004, 09:27 PM
isferno's Avatar
isferno isferno is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 455
Default

I got the following reply back on my question if the feature as I described could have been an asteroid. (As the feature looked like a splash with a crown and a trail)
The first set of values (especially density) were the ones I provided as possible values, (of which I assumed were correct for the stratosphere of the Sun.)

Quote:

With the numbers you gave me, 8 km diameter, 10 kg/m3 density, 72 km/s velocity,
I calculate an energy of 7e21 joules. Your assumed density is extremely low; if
I put in a more realistic density of 1000 kg/m3, that makes it 7e23 joules.
I'll use this larger number in the rest of the analysis.

The pixels in your image are about 8000 kilometers on a side. Each pixel
radiates about 3.7e21 joules every second. The reddish area I think you're
referring to covers something on the order of 100 pixels, so we're talking about
3.7e23 joules/second as the normal energy output from this region. Over the
four hours between successive frames, the total energy output would be 5.3e27
joules, which is 7600 times more than the energy presumed to be deposited by an
asteroid. In other words, the energy deposited by even a fairly large asteroid
is miniscule compared to the energy that the Sun is putting out all the time.

There's no need to invoke asteroids to explain energy release in the corona,
such as the one you point out. Energy is being released in the corona all the
time, due to reconnection events in the magnetic field. The event that you
point out is just one example.

William Thompson
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Thank you for replying Mr. Thompson.
__________________
Have you found the loop or the loophole?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today