Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2005, 07:57 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,018
Default

SUMMARY: Astronomers have found a fast moving pulsar on a trajectory that'll take it completely out of the Milky Way. The object, called B1508+55, is located about 7,700 light-years from Earth. The incredibly sharp radio vision of the continent-wide Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) has tracked this pulsar moving at approximately 1,100 km/s (670 miles/s). By tracking its position back, the astronomers have calculated that it started out in the constellation Cygnus. A powerful nearby supernova explosion probably kicked it into its current trajectory.

View full article

What do you think about this story? Post your comments below.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2005, 01:12 AM
Greg's Avatar
Greg Greg is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Laconia, NH
Posts: 585
Default

This is quite fascinating. It shws that we have a long way to go when it comes to understanding the behavior of superdense objects like black holes and pulsars. Yjr current (popular) models cannot account for the velocity of this pulsar's movement out of the galaxy.
__________________
Quid hoc ad aeternitatum
The conversion of complex and abstract ideas into simple and concrete ones is the essential function of teacher of a body of knowledge.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2005, 07:38 AM
AstroStart.nl AstroStart.nl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 44
Default

How long does it take before this pulsar is outside of our galaxy?
__________________
Tim Kraayvanger
webmaster AstroStart
webmaster@astrostart.nl

The one and only Dutch astronomy site with news, articles and much more.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-September-2005, 05:42 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroStart.nl
How long does it take before this pulsar is outside of our galaxy?
As you can imagine, there is no distinct property line that is the boundary of our galaxy, so no precise answer can be given to that question. Perhaps something like "How long till it is further than the most distant known globular cluster?" would make more sense, or perhaps "How long till it's half the distance to M31?"

Concerning mechanisms for getting this object going this fast, there are some that are known. I think the best is that this Pulsar was part of a close binary system, and that this system passed close to a large black hole (perhaps 10-50 solar masses), and that the companion was grabbed by the black hole, and the pulsar was kicked with new excessive velocity. This is similar to the mechanism suggested for the hyper-velocity star seen last year, and apparently coming from the SMBH in the center of the Milky Way.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-September-2005, 05:46 PM
iron4's Avatar
iron4 iron4 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 274
Default

I wouldn't want to have such a bullet coming towards Earth :S
__________________
Travelling around the Universe
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-September-2005, 06:18 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iron4
I wouldn't want to have such a bullet coming towards Earth :S
I wouldn't either. Fortunately the odds of this happening are very low.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2005, 11:59 AM
Maha Vailo Maha Vailo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 1,256
Default

Fortunately, there are no intergalactic higway patrolmen out there to give it a speeding ticket.

- Maha "but Officer, I wasn't going that fast!" Vailo
__________________
When you get down to it, Science answers how. Religion answers why. - hippietrekx

The Warp Point, my new geek culture blog.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2005, 03:22 PM
Argos's Avatar
Argos Argos is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 22°20'42"S / 49°03'14"W
Posts: 7,870
Default

I´ve heard people using the expression "scale length" to define the boundaries of the Milky Way. That would be the point where the luminosity of the surrounding stars falls below about 4% of the total luminosity.
__________________
What brings us together is stronger than what pulls us apart
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2005, 03:37 PM
johninf johninf is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
Default

"This is the first direct measurement of a neutron star's speed that exceeds 1,000 kilometers per second," said Walter Brisken, an NRAO astronomer. "Most earlier estimates of neutron-star speeds depended on educated guesses about their distances. With this one, we have a precise, direct measurement of the distance, so we can measure the speed directly," Brisken said.
I question the truth of this!
Do any astonomers have"a precise, direct measurement of the distance"?
Any measurement using Hubbles law is doomed to failure.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2005, 05:34 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johninf
Do any astonomers have"a precise, direct measurement of the distance"? Any measurement using Hubbles law is doomed to failure.
You can be sure that they didn't use "Hubble's Law" to measure the distance to this neutron star. Hubble's Law only works for distances to clusters of galaxies, and this thing in in our galaxy.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2005, 05:52 PM
suitti suitti is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 123
Default Speed Limit, export, import, contact avoidance

Quote:
Fortunately, there are no intergalactic higway patrolmen out there to give it a speeding ticket.
186,000 miles per second. Its not just a good idea. Its the law.

So, we're exporting black holes now.

I'd be curious what the odds are of importing black holes, ejected from other galaxies. Probably low odds even if galaxies spit out alot of them. Once it leaves the Milky Way, it seems likely that it would be hard to detect, as it would run out of material to eat.

There was a neutron star story a few years back where the neutron star preferentially funneled material towards one pole, giving it a kick in the other direction, allowing it to leave the nursery.

Having a black hole eat the Earth would ruin your whole day. It may be unlikely, but the expected value of the proposition is still pretty bad. Still, the expected value (loss) for meteors striking the Earth is likely worse.

It might be interesting to speculate on what could be done if we knew that a black hole, or neutron star was coming our way in, say, 10,000,000 years. Could we engineer a miss by altering Earth's orbit?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2005, 09:47 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johninf
I question the truth of this!
Do any astonomers have"a precise, direct measurement of the distance"?
Any measurement using Hubbles law is doomed to failure.
They used parallax to find the distance, which is extremely precise. While this was not in the press release, it was in the paper published by the scientists, which I read last week.

You cannot just read a press release and judge the science of the announcement. You have to go to the paper itself at least.
__________________
Phil Plait
The Bad Astronomer
http://www.badastronomy.com
badastro@badastronomy.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today