Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-September-2005, 09:23 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 13,018
Default Astrophoto: M104 by Joseph Caruana

SUMMARY: Joseph Caruana took this picture of M104. Joseph used a Meade DSI PRO to take this image.

Do you have photos you'd like to share? Post them to the Universe Today astrophotography forum or email them to me directly, and I might feature one in Universe Today.

View full article
What do you think about this story? post your comments below.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2005, 04:35 PM
suitti suitti is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 123
Default

The Meade DSI PRO is a pretty inexpensive camera - $400 USD list.
I'm curious what scope was used?

Well, M104 is maybe 8.6 minutes of arc. This image shows the object about 243 pixels across. The imager has 9.6x7.5 micron sized pixels. Assuming the 400x395 image was cropped from 510x492 - rather than scaled, and not rotated, then the image is about 243 pixels per minute of arc, and a second of arc requires about 4.5 pixels. Then, if my math is right, the scope has about 4.8 meters effective focal length. If the image was scaled down instead of cropped, then the focal length is larger. If my math is wrong, its anyone's guess.

One can speculate about the aperture size. It appears that there are about 3 pixels per second of arc. The image is probably oversampled by a factor of three, suggesting a 250 or 300 mm aperture.
M104 is about mag 9.2. One might use the above to estimate exposure length. However, i don't know the quatum efficiency of the camera, and i'm deep in guesses as it is.

So, what was the scope that was used?

Nice image.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today