Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2007, 09:26 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 11,134
Post New Technique for Finding the Mass of Black Holes

It might sound surprising, but one of the most difficult tasks astronomers have is determining the mass of objects. It takes a binary system, where two stars or orbiting one another, to be able to make an accurate mass calculation. ...

Read the full blog entry
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16-May-2007, 11:39 PM
RussT RussT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,514
Default

http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01...e-black-holes/

Even Dwarf Galaxies Have Supermassive Black Holes!

Quote:
Dwarf galaxy VCC128, which lies in the Virgo Cluster, is only 1% the size of the Milky Way. But they noticed that it has a double nucleus. They discovered that this double nucleus is actually the two sides of a ring of stars surrounding a black hole. As supermassive black holes go, it’s not as large as our own, but it still contains 1 million to 50 million times the mass of the Sun.

This could mean that other dwarf galaxies with dwarf nuclei contain black holes of their own, raising the possibility that every galaxy contains a black hole.
How about that.
__________________
RussT
________________________________
Everything is, as it should be, otherwise, it wouldn't be!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2007, 05:49 AM
Launch window's Avatar
Launch window Launch window is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,898
Default

So how many Sun masses is a regular intermediate blackhole
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2007, 10:36 AM
RussT RussT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Launch window View Post
So how many Sun masses is a regular intermediate blackhole
This Dwarf galaxy has somewhere between 1 million and 50 million sol masses.

Quote:
As supermassive black holes go, it’s not as large as our own, but it still contains 1 million to 50 million times the mass of the Sun.
But there are stellar black holes, the black holes they have found in the center of globular clusters of stars (which I think they are classifying as the Intermediate), the MBH's in Dwarfs, and then the SMBH's found in the cores of Galaxies.

It has not been accepted yet that there are MBH's an all Dwarfs, or even ALL galaxies, but as the article states, this may well be the case.

I Personally think that the Nuker Team is on the right track, as they have determined that Black Hole Birth and the speed of stars and gas in the outer rims of spirals is very intimately related.
__________________
RussT
________________________________
Everything is, as it should be, otherwise, it wouldn't be!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-June-2007, 12:39 AM
Nick4 Nick4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 579
Default

This is starting to make scens to me
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today