Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 06:50 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 11,156
Default IAU Throws Pluto a Bone: "Plutoid"

Almost two years after the International Astronomical Union (IAU) General Assembly demoted Pluto from a "real" planet to the new category of dwarf planets, the IAU, as promised, has decided on a name for trans-Neptunian dwarf planets similar to Pluto. The name "Plutoid" was proposed and accepted by the IAU at its recent meeting in [...]

More...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 06:56 PM
Argos's Avatar
Argos Argos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 22°20'42"S / 49°03'14"W
Posts: 6,529
Default

Ok. We´re all waiting for Ceresoids...
__________________
"As truth is gathered, I rearrange,
Inside out, outside in - Perpetual change."
- A British rock band
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 07:45 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,976
Default

I nominate Hermoid for the ones we can't fiind

Probably because they're out around Uranus.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 07:48 PM
Argos's Avatar
Argos Argos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 22°20'42"S / 49°03'14"W
Posts: 6,529
Default

Or should it be 'hermesoids'?
__________________
"As truth is gathered, I rearrange,
Inside out, outside in - Perpetual change."
- A British rock band
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 08:20 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,976
Default

OK, let's see which one everybody likes
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 09:46 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,351
Default

What a shame 'Plutino' was already taken. 'Plutoid' sounds a bit meh. Might as well have called them 'Plutards'.
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 10:16 PM
trinitree88 trinitree88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,309
Talking Plutards...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disinfo Agent View Post
What a shame 'Plutino' was already taken. 'Plutoid' sounds a bit meh. Might as well have called them 'Plutards'.
Disinfo. Actually I like Plutards the best..
__________________
A third rate theory forbids
A second rate theory explains after the fact
A first rate theory predicts...A. Lomonosov
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2008, 11:33 PM
laurele laurele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 228
Send a message via AIM to laurele
Default

Just when it seems the IAU cannot get any more ridiculous, they prove us wrong. Plutoids? Come on! How many members took part in this decision? It had to be less than the 424 or four percent who voted in Prague because this was not even done at a General Assembly. As Alan Stern accurately described, it's just another backroom deal that reveals how out of touch the IAU really is. When you have to create categories like "ceroids" and "plutoids," it's clear the focus has been lost in ridiculous minutia. The correct solution is to simply assign ice dwarfs as a subcategory of planets for small icy bodies that don't clear their orbits. These astronomers may be smart, but they don't understand the first thing about language, and they are bungling all their attempts to communicate astronomy with the public. I hope Stern goes ahead with forming a rival organization.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Portrait Made of Pluto and its Moons ToSeek Astronomy 5 18-October-2007 07:16 PM
1 Year Without Pluto - & 12 reasons to reinstate it! Mungascr Astronomy 56 02-September-2007 07:09 PM
Michael Brown makes the case for demoting Pluto baric Astronomy 2 05-February-2006 05:57 PM
Congress kills Pluto Mission (AGAIN!!) spfrss Space Exploration 19 27-October-2003 03:06 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today