Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Universe Today Story Comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-August-2008, 05:20 AM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 11,383
Default NASA is Making Preliminary Plans to Extend Shuttle Launches Beyond 2010

According to an internal email, NASA staff have been instructed to initiate a study into extending the operational lifetime of the Shuttle to bridge the 5-year gap between planned Shuttle retirement and Constellation commencement. In an apparent U-turn in the US space agency's policy, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin has ordered a feasibility study to assess [...]

More...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30-August-2008, 07:18 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Verginia Crater
Posts: 11,828
Default

Quote:
Griffin has, until now, been opposed to extending the Shuttle program primarily due to financial reasons; the effort and funds required could hurt the Constellation Program. But it would seem that world events and politics could be forcing him to reconsider…
This closing statement raises the concern in my mind of financial delays in the Constellation program.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2008, 05:06 PM
JustAFriend JustAFriend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 759
Default

"World events and politics..."

Hmmmm... or maybe the fact that a lot of the new DOD spy sats are so big they NEED the Shuttle to launch them....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2008, 05:08 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 7,766
Default

Would world events and politics please leave these poor people alone? They have suffered enough, and really need some love for Constellation.
__________________
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"Carl Sagan sent a message to ET,
Neil Armstrong walked in the Sea of Tranquility
Steve Squyers built Spirit and Opportunity
Dan Haylen upchucked in zero gravity." -Brent Simon, The Space Camp Song
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2008, 10:13 PM
Warren Platts's Avatar
Warren Platts Warren Platts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Great Divide Basin
Posts: 1,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
Would world events and politics please leave these poor people alone? They have suffered enough, and really need some love for Constellation.
We should view recent world events as an opportunity! Send a message to the Russians by bailing out of the ISS altogether!

It would free up $30-$40 billion USD for Constellation.
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2008, 10:19 PM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 1,518
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts View Post
We should view recent world events as an opportunity! Send a message to the Russians by bailing out of the ISS altogether!

It would free up $30-$40 billion USD for Constellation.
Wrong. We can't pull out of the ISS. Period. Paragraph. First of all, if we "gave" it to the Russians and they decided to kick the rest of the world off of it (easy, since they'd be the only ones capable of sending people up to it), they could quite quickly, turn it into an orbiting weapons platform.

Secondly, if everyone agreed to pull out of the ISS, there's no proceedure to safely deorbit it, so we'd no doubt have to spend $30 - $40 billion or more, making sure that it comes down safely, by dismantling it. (Can't let it come down intact, unless you want to evacuate an entire ocean region.)
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04
Tuckers! Science! Automotive Oddities! Boycott Trek XI! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2008, 11:58 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 7,766
Default

What Tuckerfan said. Besides, bailing out would be mean.
__________________
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"Carl Sagan sent a message to ET,
Neil Armstrong walked in the Sea of Tranquility
Steve Squyers built Spirit and Opportunity
Dan Haylen upchucked in zero gravity." -Brent Simon, The Space Camp Song
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 12:03 AM
GeorgeLeRoyTirebiter's Avatar
GeorgeLeRoyTirebiter GeorgeLeRoyTirebiter is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Late to the party
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan View Post
Wrong. We can't pull out of the ISS. Period. Paragraph. First of all, if we "gave" it to the Russians and they decided to kick the rest of the world off of it (easy, since they'd be the only ones capable of sending people up to it), they could quite quickly, turn it into an orbiting weapons platform.
That wouldn't be the first time they've tried manned orbiting weapons platforms (and that's not counting the cannon on the Almaz/Salyut-3 station).
__________________
"How many times have you gone rooting through your junk drawer, muttering to yourself, 'where'd I put that gun?'"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 12:58 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 1,518
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeLeRoyTirebiter View Post
That wouldn't be the first time they've tried manned orbiting weapons platforms (and that's not counting the cannon on the Almaz/Salyut-3 station).
IIRC, they've done a number of concept studies (not that US hasn't, I'm sure, but the Soviets/Russians seem to take it a bit farther than we do) besides those. They're also the only ones to officially carry a firearm into space, as part of the standard "survival kit" for the crews. NASA may very well do so (it does, after all, make a lot of sense for a survival kit to have a gun in it), but they're officially silent/denying the matter.
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04
Tuckers! Science! Automotive Oddities! Boycott Trek XI! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 09:51 AM
zerocold's Avatar
zerocold zerocold is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
What Tuckerfan said. Besides, bailing out would be mean.
More likely stupid, a lot of investment done in the ISS, i don't think the Europens and the Russians will get a lot of troubles operating it, and maybe with new partners like China or India, so what the NASA will do when their modules were expelled due maintenace costs, or china's astronauts are occuping their modules, launch another SS for them?...good joke

Either way these are bad news for the Constellation, this decision is political, but this doesn't mean is unbased, they don't want to have any dependence of the Soyus to go to the ISS, or maybe they think the russians could boikot them... i seriously doubt it have something to do with spy satellites

Last edited by zerocold; 01-September-2008 at 10:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 01:15 PM
Warren Platts's Avatar
Warren Platts Warren Platts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Great Divide Basin
Posts: 1,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan View Post
Wrong. We can't pull out of the ISS. Period. Paragraph. First of all, if we "gave" it to the Russians and they decided to kick the rest of the world off of it (easy, since they'd be the only ones capable of sending people up to it), they could quite quickly, turn it into an orbiting weapons platform.
My dear Tuckerfan! They couldn't do that! It would be a violation of the Outer Space Treaty!

Quote:
Secondly, if everyone agreed to pull out of the ISS, there's no proceedure to safely deorbit it, so we'd no doubt have to spend $30 - $40 billion or more, making sure that it comes down safely, by dismantling it. (Can't let it come down intact, unless you want to evacuate an entire ocean region.)
I wish people would think of these things before they build!
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 01:20 PM
Warren Platts's Avatar
Warren Platts Warren Platts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Great Divide Basin
Posts: 1,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerocold View Post
More likely stupid, a lot of investment done in the ISS, i don't think the Europeans and the Russians will get a lot of troubles operating it, and maybe with new partners like China or India, so what the NASA will do when their modules were expelled due maintenance costs, or china's astronauts are occupying their modules, launch another SS for them?...good joke
Great investment! Better than Worldcom!

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerocold
Either way these are bad news for the Constellation, this decision is political, but this doesn't mean is unbased, they don't want to have any dependence of the Soyus to go to the ISS, or maybe they think the russians could boikot them... i seriously doubt it have something to do with spy satellites
Now you're making sense! If it's good for Constellation to bail out of the space shuttle, just think how much better it would be to bail out of the space station!
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 01:22 PM
Warren Platts's Avatar
Warren Platts Warren Platts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Great Divide Basin
Posts: 1,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
What Tuckerfan said. Besides, bailing out would be mean.
Sometimes you have to stand up to the bullies in the playground. . . .
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 03:27 PM
djellison djellison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts View Post
If it's good for Constellation to bail out of the space shuttle, just think how much better it would be to bail out of the space station!
ISS = international collab. NASA and the US Gov have said, repeatedly, that they want to have international collab on the return to the moon.

What chance do you think NASA has of ant future international collaboration if they leave their international partners on the ISS in the lurch by pulling out before completion. They'd be the unreliable guys that no one wants to get onboard with.

Your analysis of the ISS is overly simplified and very shortsighted
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 03:49 PM
Warren Platts's Avatar
Warren Platts Warren Platts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Great Divide Basin
Posts: 1,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djellison View Post
ISS = international collab. NASA and the US Gov have said, repeatedly, that they want to have international collab on the return to the moon.

What chance do you think NASA has of ant future international collaboration if they leave their international partners on the ISS in the lurch by pulling out before completion. They'd be the unreliable guys that no one wants to get onboard with.

Your analysis of the ISS is overly simplified and very shortsighted
If there's a lesson to be learned from the ISS, it's that international partnerships aren't all that they're cracked up to be.

For one thing, the project can only progress as fast as the slowest partner. How long did we have to wait for Russia to deliver its crucial module?

Then there's the problem international politics.

It would be nice if we could set aside such nastiness.

Yet, here it rears its ugly head again. The US would not be contemplating extending the space shuttle were it not for the Russian adventure in Georgia.
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 04:37 PM
djellison djellison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts View Post
How long did we have to wait for Russia to deliver its crucial module? .
How long had NASA spent (and indeed, how much had NASA spent) on the fore-runners to the ISS ( Freedom etc ). It took that Russian module to make the ISS possible. The USA was spending money, building nothing, and getting nowhere until the project became international. Yeah - the USA had to wait for Zvezda and Zarya...but not as long as it spent waiting to sort itself out first. It's Russia that has kept the ISS alive. Were it not for Soyuz and Progress - the Columbia accident would have meant the end of the space station. No nation can realistically maintain two unique means of manned orbital access - that colaboration means there were two - and that colaboration kept the station alive when NASA was floundering in the quagmire after the Columbia accident.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 06:15 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 7,766
Default

I'm with djellison. It's like a team of superheroes. Together, we can do much more than we ever could apart.
__________________
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"Carl Sagan sent a message to ET,
Neil Armstrong walked in the Sea of Tranquility
Steve Squyers built Spirit and Opportunity
Dan Haylen upchucked in zero gravity." -Brent Simon, The Space Camp Song
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2008, 09:11 PM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 1,518
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts View Post
My dear Tuckerfan! They couldn't do that! It would be a violation of the Outer Space Treaty!
And you think that this will stop them, how?

Quote:
I wish people would think of these things before they build!
Maybe there simply wasn't money in the budget, but had to continue with the project due to Congressional mandates.
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04
Tuckers! Science! Automotive Oddities! Boycott Trek XI! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither.
Reply With Quote